Barnyard dust could hold the answer to asthma

August 09, 2016

New research is showing microbes from farm animals, carried into the home in dust, could be a magic ingredient in the prevention of asthma in children.

Published recently in The New England Journal of Medicine, scientists explained that the results they have found are convincing enough that the possibility of developing a spray to do the same thing for children who do not have regular contact with cows and horses, could soon be a reality.

According to the study, the discovery originated with an idea that has been around for years: that a growing number of children were developing asthma because their daily environments were simply too clean — known as the hygiene hypothesis. In fact, as many as 10.6% of grade-school children today have asthma and there is currently no cure available.

The most consistent findings have come from studies that compared children who grew up on farms and have less asthma, compared to those who grew up in other environments. However in every case, there were many other differences between the children who had less asthma and those who had more, making it unclear what exactly might have led to different asthma rates.

What was missing was evidence that one essential factor in the environment was protecting children and a reason it had exerted its effect. The new study provides this, asthma researchers say, which is what makes its results so spectacular, although still early on.

The new work began when a group of investigators noticed that something peculiar was happening with children from two insular farming groups: the Amish of Indiana and the Hutterites of North Dakota. Asthma is rare among the Amish, affecting 2 to 4% of the population, but common among the Hutterites, with 15 to 20% affected.

Yet, the Amish and the Hutterites have similar genetic backgrounds. The Amish originated in Switzerland, the Hutterites in Austria. Members of both groups have large families and a very simple lifestyle. The article states their diets are similar, children in both groups have little exposure to tobacco smoke or polluted air, and both groups forbid indoor pets. Both groups also have meticulously clean homes.

There was one difference, though: farming methods. The Amish live on single-family dairy farms, do not use electricity, and use horses to pull their plows and for transportation. Their barns are close to their homes, and their children play in them. The Hutterites, on the other hand, have no objection to electricity and live on large, industrialized communal farms. Their cows are housed in huge barns, more like hangars, away from their homes, and children typically do not play in Hutterite barns.

Knowing this, the researchers decided to start with a small study. They looked at 30 Amish children and 30 Hutterite children and asked what sort of immune cells were in their blood.

“We never thought we would see a difference,” Carole Ober, an author of the study said in the article. To the researchers’ astonishment, she said, “we saw whopping differences with very, very different cell types and cell numbers.”

None of the Amish children had asthma and they all had a large proportion of neutrophils — white blood cells that are the immune system’s paramedics and are part of what is known as the innate immune system. These children’s neutrophils were newly emerged from their bone marrow, evidence of a continual low-grade reaction to microbial invaders.

“All 30 of the Amish kids had this,” Anne I. Sperling, another author of the study said.

By contrast, six of the 30 Hutterite children had asthma, and all of them had far fewer neutrophils in their blood. The neutrophils that they did have were older ones, not cells that had just emerged. Instead, their blood was swarming with another type of immune cell, eosinophils, which provoke allergic reactions. It was as if they were primed for an asthma attack as soon as they breathed something to set it off. With the Amish children, Dr. Sperling said, it would clearly take a lot more provocation to set off an allergic response.

The researchers decided that the differences between the Amish and the Hutterite children were so great that they should forge ahead with additional research to try to figure out what was stimulating the Amish innate immune system.

Next, they analyzed dust from the Amish and the Hutterite homes and found that the Amish dust was loaded with debris from bacteria; while the Hutterite dust was not. The researchers sent the dust to Dr. Donata Vercelli, an associate director of the asthma and airway research center at the University of Arizona, who would test the dust in mice.

She put dust — Amish or Hutterite — into the airways of mice 14 times over a month and then exposed the animals to allergens. She measured how the airways responded: Did they constrict and twitch? Were they inflamed?

“We found exactly what we found in the children,” Dr. Vercelli said. “If we give the Amish dust, we protect the mice. If we give the Hutterite dust, we do not protect them.”

Dr. Vercelli repeated the test and added another control. She gave the Amish dust to mice that were missing genes needed for the innate immune response. This time, the dust did not protect them.

“It was incredibly exciting,” Dr. Sperling said. “Now we have a model that allows us to do these studies like never before. We can zoom in on microbial products.”

Now, said Dr. Talal Chatila, an immunologist at Harvard Medical School, “it is not far-fetched to start thinking of how one could harness those bacteria for a therapeutic intervention.”

For more information, click here.

Category: Agriculture, Life Sciences, Healthcare, Allergens